![]() The Main Naval Parade in honor of Navy Day will be held in St. Alaska has a story, even if it was only shooting down manned missiles and blowing up shore batteries or occupying and establishing South Korea.ST. That and the fact Alaska was not only completed, but served in full capacity in the WW2. Personally I'm holding out on Alaska because survivability grossly outweighs ~520mm of penetration any day of the week. Kronshtadt's strength is the penetration of her guns balanced by 25mm plating.Īlaska's strength is her plating balanced by her lack of penetration and shell velocity.ġ) Moskva is tier10, and outfitted as suchĢ) uses more traditional heavy cruiser armament ģ) has less penetration but higher dpm than Alaska or Kronshtadtĥ] Moskva has more plating: 50mm lower bow and full midships.Ħ] Moskva only has a low 160mm armor belt. On the other hand, Kronshtadt gets +500mm of armor pen at 15km whereas Alaska and Moskva got nowhere near that. What sets (from show cases) Alaska apart is that unlike Kronshtadt is that Alaska gets usn CA plating, usn AP angles with improved deck values: 38mm vs 25. Not to mention Kronshtadt has comparable AA to a t6 BB at t9. That means Kronshtadt is extremely vulnerable to most BBs or high RoF HE spammer she meets. Kronshtadt is completely covered in 25mm armor everywhere except the superstructure, armor belt, turrets and barbets. You want a comparison between Moskva and Kronshtadt and an unreleased Alaska?īetween Moskva and Kronshtadt there is no comparison other than both being cruisers, having 11.7km radar and a different health pool. I've seen mostly positive things from all 3. ![]() ![]() Simple question since I already have Musashi and the Kron is leaving free xp how does it compare to the Moskva and the WIP Alaska? If you could rank them in terms of what would be worth the price for my play style as I am a BB main that would greatly help.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |